JiggerJ,
You are calling religion a 'cancer', but you're demonstrating one of the problems of selectively taking a small sample of the behaivor of a billion+ member ideology and assuming its universal applicability towards accurately describing the entire group. Well then, every group ever is a cancer on society.
Radical femimists? Well, all feminists are a cancer then. Gun nuts? Guess all gun owners are batshit crazy. White supremacists? Damn whiteys!
Further, trying to censor a religion like this (assuming the report is accurate; I haven't checked that earlier Reuters link yet) is exactly the kind of thing that pisses a lot of us off about the role of religion in parts of history. Why would you support the very kind of measures used against religion that you would lambast if it were used by the religious?
You are calling religion a 'cancer', but you're demonstrating one of the problems of selectively taking a small sample of the behaivor of a billion+ member ideology and assuming its universal applicability towards accurately describing the entire group. Well then, every group ever is a cancer on society.
Radical femimists? Well, all feminists are a cancer then. Gun nuts? Guess all gun owners are batshit crazy. White supremacists? Damn whiteys!
Further, trying to censor a religion like this (assuming the report is accurate; I haven't checked that earlier Reuters link yet) is exactly the kind of thing that pisses a lot of us off about the role of religion in parts of history. Why would you support the very kind of measures used against religion that you would lambast if it were used by the religious?