RE: Chess games
October 2, 2013 at 11:04 pm
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2013 at 11:26 pm by bennyboy.)
lol you beat the crap out of those poor guys.
I like the first game, because you were responding to his defensive weaknesses in a way that challenged him to come up with a defence-- which he didn't. After move 5 it's basically over-- you have superior development, and his king side is just smashed.
I dont' think the Qeen move is that good. He should bring his queen to E7, and then his knight gets a free move, since it will be attacking your queen. However, even with that, your bishop is preventing castling, his horribly placed black bishop is blocking off his queen's pawn, and his white bishop is stuck behind a wall of pawns, and all your pieces have brilliant squares to develp to. If I was in black's position, I'd probably just resign.
I like the first game, because you were responding to his defensive weaknesses in a way that challenged him to come up with a defence-- which he didn't. After move 5 it's basically over-- you have superior development, and his king side is just smashed.
I dont' think the Qeen move is that good. He should bring his queen to E7, and then his knight gets a free move, since it will be attacking your queen. However, even with that, your bishop is preventing castling, his horribly placed black bishop is blocking off his queen's pawn, and his white bishop is stuck behind a wall of pawns, and all your pieces have brilliant squares to develp to. If I was in black's position, I'd probably just resign.
