Then there was Dr. Hovind's $100,000 challenge to prove evolution. Of course it was so biased and slanted that there's no way anyone could ever prove it, because to win you'd have to prove straw man arguments as real, including cosmology, abiogenesis, and perhaps a couple other things which have nothing to do with evolution, and IIRC one part of it was that you had to prove that evolution is the only way that life could have developed on this planet and not through God's magic. Then, even if someone were up to the challenge, the judges were creationist preachers or friends of Hovind. And finally, it was not even proven that Hovind had the $100,000 in the first place.
Kind of stacking the deck like someone tried to do here in a formal debate.
Kind of stacking the deck like someone tried to do here in a formal debate.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
