(October 13, 2013 at 4:28 pm)Minimalist Wrote: None of them even claim to be eye witness accounts.... let alone "reliable" eye-witness accounts.
Right. Just a taunt to the Christians who flip flop between "perfect, reliable, best attested, greatest story ever told, and people would have cried 'false' if it wasn't true..." and "hey, c'mon, whaddaya want, nobody wrote anything down back then, and it's not like anyone outside Jesus' circle should have paid any attention to him, and so what if the stories are out of order, and you're all just pick-pick-pick on all the contradictions..."
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
