Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.

[Lion IRC]

First, thanks to everyone for the correction. Much appreciated.

Second, a reply to Lion:

The human race proceeds by Darwinian sex selection in the form of OPPOSITE gender mating.
Don't blame deep-seated heterosexism on Christians.

But there has ALWAYS been homosexuality murder, rape, pedophilia and always will be, yet the human population on this planet continues to grow apace.

See what I did to your logical fallacy?

...
Furthermore, you claim to be against gay marriage since it cannot produce children, yet you seem to forget that marriage isn't necessary for procreation.

Thats not the reason I am against gay "marriage". I have never made that argument against SSM. Try using the quote function instead of the sock puppet ventriloquism routine.

See? Strawman argument all gone now. Bye bye.
Next?
Oh wait....it's ANOTHER strawman argument.

...Face it, mate - it's the homosexual act that bothers you, nothing else.

Nope. I'm not squeamish. If I closed my eyes, I can probably imagine that a ''blindfolded" human orgasm sensation feels pretty much the same no matter what gender or age or other species is involved. Wanna legalize pet brothels?
Or are you one of those..."animals dont like having orgasms err...I mean...animals cant give consent" type folk?

...Your lot don't want to ban gay marriage, you want to ban gay sex, a practice which cannot possibly do YOU any harm whatsoever. Feckwit.

Well, I suppose if you are running that lame... no harm, NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS trope, how about the starving people in Africa? Do we say they are none of our business?
Come to think of it, someone was earlier making the "over population argument" for homosexuality.

How about those unmarried moms who got pregnant. Their body. Their choice. Should tax payers, (I should say religious charities,) provide welfare for them? Or is that another MYOB look the other way scenario?

...
Face it, mate...

...
Feckwit.

Make up your mind.