Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.

[Esquilax]

My point is that you in principle think that it's acceptable to prohibit sexual behavior which you find annoying in lesser beings.

Except that Zazzy had no issues with the sexual behavior but instead with the noise it made, and the fact that it was causing demonstrable harm to the bird, two things you seem to have missed in your mad dash to make the most simplistic and invalid comparison you possibly could.

Second, as I've pointed out before, humans don't have an automatic right to sex toys either, especially if they're disruptive. But they do have that right to sex, assuming it's consensual.

If god exists, he should likewise be allowed to make rules regarding human sexuality, as he is the greater being.

Given that the first premise is wrong, the conclusion cannot be correct, and you were making a lot of assumptions in the formulation of it to begin with, regarding Zazzy's thoughts about being a greater being to her birds. But you'd still need to prove your god exists before the conclusion became valid, too.