What a nice muslim we have here.
It doesn't seem to know how to read properly...
It's like... like it has some blinders in its eyes.
On top of that, it's a conspiracy theorist muslim... zionists... pffffffffff
People from Zion?
Zion (Hebrew: ציון), also transliterated Sion, Tzion or Tsion, is a place name often used as a synonym for Jerusalem.... this Zion? Jerusalem? Jews?
Try to remove those blinders you have on and read something.
Einstein - at most, deist - came up with one of the most important theories of the 20th century.
You've heard of Bohr, but there were many others...
Paul Dirac said:
Can you see yourself in this quote?
Of course not... you see me, us, atheists... and that is why religions is so dangerous. It can turn otherwise decent people into monsters.
How many terrorists would there be without religion?
How many deaths would have been avoided without religion?
You claim an atheist (or secular) society would destroy itself... quite the contrary, as you can witness by investigating into present day societies which are, for all intents and purposes, secular, such as northern european Norway, Sweden, Finland.
It doesn't seem to know how to read properly...
It's like... like it has some blinders in its eyes.
On top of that, it's a conspiracy theorist muslim... zionists... pffffffffff
People from Zion?
Zion (Hebrew: ציון), also transliterated Sion, Tzion or Tsion, is a place name often used as a synonym for Jerusalem.... this Zion? Jerusalem? Jews?
Try to remove those blinders you have on and read something.
Einstein - at most, deist - came up with one of the most important theories of the 20th century.
You've heard of Bohr, but there were many others...
Paul Dirac said:
Quote:I cannot understand why we idle discussing religion. If we are honest—and scientists have to be—we must admit that religion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. The very idea of God is a product of the human imagination. It is quite understandable why primitive people, who were so much more exposed to the overpowering forces of nature than we are today, should have personified these forces in fear and trembling. But nowadays, when we understand so many natural processes, we have no need for such solutions. I can't for the life of me see how the postulate of an Almighty God helps us in any way. What I do see is that this assumption leads to such unproductive questions as why God allows so much misery and injustice, the exploitation of the poor by the rich and all the other horrors He might have prevented. If religion is still being taught, it is by no means because its ideas still convince us, but simply because some of us want to keep the lower classes quiet. Quiet people are much easier to govern than clamorous and dissatisfied ones. They are also much easier to exploit
Can you see yourself in this quote?
Of course not... you see me, us, atheists... and that is why religions is so dangerous. It can turn otherwise decent people into monsters.
How many terrorists would there be without religion?
How many deaths would have been avoided without religion?
You claim an atheist (or secular) society would destroy itself... quite the contrary, as you can witness by investigating into present day societies which are, for all intents and purposes, secular, such as northern european Norway, Sweden, Finland.
