The logic of realm U need not be the same as the logic in realm G...
All of my hypothesis are equally logical, considering the unknown that lies beyond our Universe.
And what you think about this realm G or essence G is just that, a hypothesis about what is unknowable and beyond our universe.
There is no way you, or anyone, can claim that one of these hypothesis is more likely, or in accordance with the laws of physics, than any other hypothesis.
There is no way for you to know if there's a realm or an essence, or a fluffy bunny beyond the Universe.
That's why we refer to all this as mental masturbation.
Now, back to hypothesis 4). Time, as a dimension, is an axis. Why is the removal of this axis illogical?
My mind cannot comprehend timelessness. Our words depend way too much on the existence of time... within that limitation, I find no reason why an entity which creates time (and is in a timeless state) cannot destroy it (and remain in that timeless state).
"is in"... "remain"... dammit, see how easy it is to fall on the damn pitfalls of the dependence of language with time?
All of my hypothesis are equally logical, considering the unknown that lies beyond our Universe.
And what you think about this realm G or essence G is just that, a hypothesis about what is unknowable and beyond our universe.
There is no way you, or anyone, can claim that one of these hypothesis is more likely, or in accordance with the laws of physics, than any other hypothesis.
There is no way for you to know if there's a realm or an essence, or a fluffy bunny beyond the Universe.
That's why we refer to all this as mental masturbation.
Now, back to hypothesis 4). Time, as a dimension, is an axis. Why is the removal of this axis illogical?
My mind cannot comprehend timelessness. Our words depend way too much on the existence of time... within that limitation, I find no reason why an entity which creates time (and is in a timeless state) cannot destroy it (and remain in that timeless state).
"is in"... "remain"... dammit, see how easy it is to fall on the damn pitfalls of the dependence of language with time?
