(December 17, 2013 at 9:41 am)Nineteen Wrote: I say the last time ; I'm waiting for a sicientific report which has been recognized by international health organizations or psychiatric associations whatever , that its "normal" . I wont answer irrelevant posts .
Sorry to hear that 19. The problem is, "normal" is not a word one sees very often in quality research literature. When we do the convention is to state that "normal" is "within one standard deviation of the mean". Like this
So its quite hard to know what research you wish us to find unless you can be more specific, or unwrap what you mean by "normal".
It would be much like me asking you for High quality evidence that Metronidazole is "awesome" or that Thalidomide is "dodgy" or that nuclear power is "best". Those adjectives all contain value judgements which good science strives to avoid.
I'd be happy to discuss the concepts of normal or natural with you in a civil, mature way. Happy to do it here or in a private debate forum. But I'm afraid that what you've asked is pretty much impossible not because its true or untrue, but simply that the style of request does not fit with the nature of research.
Also "normal" (and for that matter "natural") depend on the population one is examining. Certain traits are "normal" for certain groups, but not for others. Wrinkly skin is "normal" for old people but not for babies. So one would also have to consider the population in which you wish us to show that Homosexuality is normal. I could show you parts of brighton where homosexuality is, from a population distribution viewpoint, quite normal.
"Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken."
Sith code
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken."
Sith code