(December 19, 2013 at 10:44 am)Esquilax Wrote: And now you're pretty much sealed your own ignorance of science, since anyone with even a passing familiarity understands that science never professes certainty on any subject; that practice (known to us sane people as "intellectual honesty") doesn't detract from the strength of the findings.
Very strange indeed.
When someone tell you that God exist you ask for concrete evidence but when you come up with your so called truth you say that science can not give concrete evidence on the excuse that this is intellectual honesty.
What a bullshit boy.
What a dung bullshit!
![Confused Confused](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Confused Confused](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Shame on you and your so called honesty.
Quote:But let's also consider this: you've given no evidence, just anecdotes sans references, and a couple books from someone without the education necessary to make the determinations he has.
........the determinations he has
One more failing.
You say HE when in fact The Big Book of Near-Death Experiences has been written by a lady.
This show that you haven't read that book and yet you try to judge and dismiss what is written as garbage.
Shame on you boy.
![Confused Confused](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Quote:As opposed to me, who gave references to actual, accredited scientists doing work with actual evidence and having the balls to own up to the fact that they might be wrong.
In the book that i am talking about (above) there are plenty of references so don't talk garbage.
Beside your scientists can be accredited as much as you like but as far as they have not come up with pure and concrete evidence they haven't solved any problem so far.
That means that so far you got nothing in your hands.
Quote:Oh, and don't think I'm going to let you get away with just sweeping your last little faux pas with the dates under the rug, now will I let you get away with forgetting the other link I posted, where you haven't even attempted one of your deeply dishonest and misinformed rebuttals.
How do you know that i didn't look at your links.
I look at them and as soon i saw that they bring no concrete evidence i decided not to bring them up.
Why should i waste my time discussing them when scientists still haven't come up with concrete evidence?
Quote:Congratulations, monkey: you've actually made yourself look stupider than you already did.
Merry Christmas boy.
Be happy and try not to get too cranky.
Don't let your cells die.
![Smile Smile](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)