RE: Proof A=A
February 23, 2010 at 6:50 pm
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2010 at 6:52 pm by Welsh cake.)
(February 22, 2010 at 3:28 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Looks like you re-stated some stuff and dodged providing evidence of your own claim cake.Correction. I'm responding to your claim that logic alone can't disprove non-physical beings that transcend reality. You're basically suggesting I've started a straw-man argument, but your argument collapses under moderate scrutiny because you haven't even established what this god-guy is yet; you're trying to assert scientific logic can't disprove your claim of whether something impossible exists outside reality or beyond the fundamental forces of the universe or not which subsequently falls into the logical fallacy of Untestability.
Here it is again: "Logic alone can actually refute impossible beings outside our plane of existence that violate reality"
Sorry, but these are the basic rules of logic fr0d0 (i.e. you cannot make a proposition that is both true and false simultaneously), so its not logic or myself who are at fault, but that your argument's invalid is actually the root of the problem here. You've made an unjustified presupposition and I don't need to remind you that the idea of god is insupportable by either logic or evidence do I? It can refute your God concept because it has many contradictory attributes (omnipotence anyone?) and therefore he belongs in the category of the logically impossible.