Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[snowtracks]

think i know what the response means: like one atheist is pacing back and forth, a colleague ask 'why are you all distrub'? he answers, "you dolt, don't you realize this could mean a chemical agent suddenly took a low entropy singularity to inflation"?

Ah, more dishonest christian obfuscation. My point, you little fool, is that "agent" does not always mean "conscious being." I see that you've decided to only accept the one alternate example I've given you, in order to make my point look ridiculous. That's rather pathetic, don't you think?

Incidentally, you've also failed to comment on the other things I've said; given the religious positions of all the people who wrote that paper- the ones, by the way, who used the word "agent" in the first place- don't you think it's rather dishonest to present their work as though they were implying a god?

Or are you going to continue ignoring this, in yet another characteristically religious attempt to avoid taking responsibility for your actions once they're called out?

of course it doesn't say 'God'. don't assume everyone is deceitful and stupid and out to recruit you, so mr. intensee can relax. people can draw their own conclusions of what the research paper says.

Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant
pertinent quotes -
pg 4
"The question then is whether the origin of the universe can be a naturally occurring fluctuation, or must it be due to an
external agent which starts the system out in a specific low entropy state? We will discuss this in greater detail in Section 6."
----------------------------------------------
then Section 6, pg 20
"Another possibility is an unknown agent intervened in the evolution, and for reasons of its own restarted the universe in the state of low entropy characterizing inflation".