(February 23, 2014 at 5:53 pm)rasetsu Wrote: Citation needed.
So, yeah, I still haven't found anything that refutes the quotes that I presented regarding Taoism and what is says about patterns in nature.
Citations needed? Hehe, don't think you're fooling me because I know you're not blind ...
But still, here they are (the citations, as you asked):
The Complete Idiots Guide to Taoism (on page 33) Wrote:
Wikipedia Wrote:Dao can be roughly thought of as the flow of the universe, or as some essence or pattern behind the natural world that keeps the universe balanced and ordered.
... whereas you hold the opposite view even though you're a Taoist yourself. Here is the citation for that, as you asked:
(February 20, 2014 at 4:23 pm)rasetsu Wrote: My background is in mathematics, so while I appreciate the notion of elegance, I view that as more a property existing in a strange and disordered pattern throughout mathematical space.
Either your opinion above is incorrect or the citations above are incorrect, because they are clearly contradictory views.
If you think that the cited quotes are incorrect, then simply show something to prove it.