(March 5, 2014 at 1:28 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:(March 5, 2014 at 2:50 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Conquerors, as the conquerors they are, do have the right to claim moral superiority and do reserve the right to enact laws as they see fit.
Oh, gee, now I understand Africa AND the Nazis! They were right all along!
/s
Well, might makes right, friend. It always did, and it still does so. History proves it.
Quote:Of course, he was a bit of a dick, too.Well, if you have bothered with conquering a people, you obviously would enact a few laws to show that you did so.
The Manchus, for example, forced the chinese to wear their hair in the queue style, and adopt their clothing as a sign of their domination.
Quote:Kilics definition of rights appears to be in the form of "might makes right"Well, in terms of war, that is the only form of "right" there is, unless you get a third party involved, who has to be mightier than both sides in order to decide what is right.
So in a way, yes, might makes right, my friend. Its the law of nature.
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?