(March 12, 2014 at 12:05 am)psychoslice Wrote:(March 11, 2014 at 11:59 pm)Bad Writer Wrote: "vactruth dot com" Wow. Just wow. Vactruth. I mean...what the heck? How do you expect us to take something like this seriously? Ever hear of "Truthers"? They are 9/11 conspiracy theorists. This is exactly the kind of medium in which the Truthers post their literature. You are getting your information from an agenda-driven source. Do you have anything from a medical journal? A peer-reviewed study? Double-blind? Please, let us know.
Medical journals are not really a good source, because they are too bias, don't forget they want their doctors to administrate this crap.
You're kidding me, right? I guess we can just throw out the last 100 years of surgical advancement then because everyone everywhere was just learning about crap from crap studies posted in medical journals.
Buddy, claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. We accept the information found in these studies because of the method used for testing the efficacy of treatments of illnesses. We do not accept your claims because you have not shown us this same degree of evidence that we have shown to you. Evidence proves a person guilty/not guilty in a court of law, correct? The same reasoning applies here.