(March 12, 2014 at 6:02 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: Actually, he didn't. The study wasn't just flawed, it was pretty much malpractice and could have been considered child abuse. He didn't "find" anything - he set out to "prove" something and didn't give a fuck who he hurt in the process. It involved 11 case subjects - definitely not enough - and has since been taken down and retracted so thoroughly that it would boggle my mind that it's still touted if it weren't for the fact that some people still believe in god.
Very true. But it's still the closest we've had to legitimate science saying vaccines are bad. And if the best you can do when attacking vaccines involves malpractice, child abuse and fraud, you really don't have a good leg to stand on.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama