(March 15, 2014 at 10:32 pm)psychoslice Wrote: ...articles in the medical journal are not always right, surely you don't think every article is 100% true, after all they are always finding new things out that out date the present beliefs, that goes without say.
I see your problem. You are making your decision based on a complete misunderstanding of science. Just because medical journals publish works that supersede old theories and practices, does not mean that those old studies were wrong. Science works with the available evidence, and if new evidence arises, theories will be take new form, but never at the expense of outdated information. Our knowledge only grows, but is never replaced. I'm not a scientist nor am I a medical doctor, no, but even a young mind can learn to comprehend this fact.
Science doesn't deal in absolutes. It is never a complete knowledge; it works with demonstrated evidence and facts. So far, the evidence does not support the theory that any vaccination is harmful. That is what we are going on; that is why we reject your claims.