(March 16, 2014 at 3:23 am)psychoslice Wrote: Well that goes for both of us doesn't it ?.
Not really! You see the work of trained doctors and scientists and go "nah, they can't be right," and dismiss their work due to some mysterious bias you refuse to explain, while I accept the findings of people who are trained to know what they're talking about.
Your completely baseless, blanket generalization that every medical researcher who doesn't get results you like is biased is not only completely ungrounded- because you don't know anything about these people- it's also borderline nonsensical; do you understand the kind of trouble a company would get into for releasing a medicine or vaccine that causes harm to people? Or the kind of credibility slam that would give to the researchers involved? To be clear, what you're saying is that these people release these products regardless of their overall safety; you're claiming that these products are out there now, hurting people now, and no scientist, across the entire world, is able to come to findings that can be replicated and peer reviewed successfully by mainstream science that confirms this.
You are positing the existence of a conspiracy driven by people for whom the overall effects of said conspiracy go against their interests, across multiple companies, cultures and so on, that nobody is able to provide compelling evidence of. At all.
Meanwhile, you accuse me of confirmation bias, when my position isn't "anything outside of what I believe is biased because of money!" like yours is, but is simply awaiting the evidence, and its review by the people who actually know what they're talking about.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!