Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 14, 2024, 4:52 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science Vs Faith
#17
RE: Science Vs Faith
how are you ? I hope you are good .
thank you :
to all what you see about this :

In the Holy Quran, God speaks about the stages of man’s embryonic development:


We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed substance)... 1 (Quran, 23:12-14)

Literally, the Arabic word alaqah has three meanings: (1) leech, (2) suspended thing, and (3) blood clot.

In comparing a leech to an embryo in the alaqah stage, we find similarity between the two2 as we can see in figure 1. Also, the embryo at this stage obtains nourishment from the blood of the mother, similar to the leech, which feeds on the blood of others.3

The second meaning of the word alaqah is “suspended thing.” This is what we can see in figures 2 and 3, the suspension of the embryo, during the alaqah stage, in the womb of the mother


The third meaning of the word alaqah is “blood clot.” We find that the external appearance of the embryo and its sacs during the alaqah stage is similar to that of a blood clot. This is due to the presence of relatively large amounts of blood present in the embryo during this stage4 (see figure 4). Also during this stage, the blood in the embryo does not circulate until the end of the third week.5 Thus, the embryo at this stage is like a clot of blood


So the three meanings of the word alaqah correspond accurately to the descriptions of the embryo at the alaqah stage.

The next stage mentioned in the verse is the mudghah stage. The Arabic word mudghah means “chewed substance.” If one were to take a piece of gum and chew it in his or her mouth and then compare it with an embryo at the mudghah stage, we would conclude that the embryo at the mudghah stage acquires the appearance of a chewed substance. This is because of the somites at the back of the embryo that “somewhat resemble teethmarks in a chewed substance.”6 (see figures 5 and 6).

How could Muhammad have possibly known all this 1400 years ago, when scientists have only recently discovered this using advanced equipment and powerful microscopes which did not exist at that time? Hamm and Leeuwenhoek were the first scientists to observe human sperm cells (spermatozoa) using an improved microscope in 1677 (more than 1000 years after Muhammad ). They mistakenly thought that the sperm cell contained a miniature preformed human being that grew when it was deposited in the female genital tract.7

Professor Emeritus Keith L. Moore8 is one of the world’s most prominent scientists in the fields of anatomy and embryology and is the author of the book entitled The Developing Human, which has been translated into eight languages. This book is a scientific reference work and was chosen by a special committee in the United States as the best book authored by one person. Dr. Keith Moore is Professor Emeritus of Anatomy and Cell Biology at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. There, he was Associate Dean of Basic Sciences at the Faculty of Medicine and for 8 years was the Chairman of the Department of Anatomy. In 1984, he received the most distinguished award presented in the field of anatomy in Canada, the J.C.B. Grant Award from the Canadian Association of Anatomists. He has directed many international associations, such as the Canadian and American Association of Anatomists and the Council of the Union of Biological Sciences.

In 1981, during the Seventh Medical Conference in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, Professor Moore said: “It has been a great pleasure for me to help clarify statements in the Quran about human development. It is clear to me that these statements must have come to Muhammad from God, because almost all of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later. This proves to me that Muhammad must have been a messenger of God.”9 (To view the RealPlayer video of this comment click here ).

Consequently, Professor Moore was asked the following question: “Does this mean that you believe that the Quran is the word of God?” He replied: “I find no difficulty in accepting this.”10

During one conference, Professor Moore stated: “....Because the staging of human embryos is complex, owing to the continuous process of change during development, it is proposed that a new system of classification could be developed using the terms mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah (what Muhammad said, did, or approved of). The proposed system is simple, comprehensive, and conforms with present embryological knowledge. The intensive studies of the Quran and hadeeth (reliably transmitted reports by the Prophet Muhammad’s companions of what he said, did, or approved of) in the last four years have revealed a system for classifying human embryos that is amazing since it was recorded in the seventh century A.D. Although Aristotle, the founder of the science of embryology, realized that chick embryos developed in stages from his studies of hen’s eggs in the fourth century B.C., he did not give any details about these stages. As far as it is known from the history of embryology, little was known about the staging and classification of human embryos until the twentieth century. For this reason, the descriptions of the human embryo in the Quran cannot be based on scientific knowledge in the seventh century. The only reasonable conclusion is: these descriptions were revealed to Muhammad from God. He could not have known such details because he was an illiterate man with absolutely no scientific training
B) The Quran on Mountains:
A book entitled Earth is a basic reference textbook in many universities around the world. One of its two authors is Professor Emeritus Frank Press. He was the Science Advisor to former US President Jimmy Carter, and for 12 years was the President of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. His book says that mountains have underlying roots.1 These roots are deeply embedded in the ground, thus, mountains have a shape like a peg (see figures 7, 8, and 9).
is how the Quran has described mountains. God has said in the Quran:

Have We not made the earth as a bed, and the mountains as pegs? (Quran, 78:6-7)

Modern earth sciences have proven that mountains have deep roots under the surface of the ground (see figure 9) and that these roots can reach several times their elevations above the surface of the ground.2 So the most suitable word to describe mountains on the basis of this information is the word ‘peg,’ since most of a properly set peg is hidden under the surface of the ground. The history of science tells us that the theory of mountains having deep roots was introduced only in the latter half of the nineteenth century.3

Mountains also play an important role in stabilizing the crust of the earth.4 They hinder the shaking of the earth. God has said in the Quran:

And He has set firm mountains in the earth so that it would not shake with you... (Quran, 16:15)

Likewise, the modern theory of plate tectonics holds that mountains work as stabilizers for the earth. This knowledge about the role of mountains as stabilizers for the earth has just begun to be understood in the framework of plate tectonics since the late 1960’s.5

Could anyone during the time of the Prophet Muhammad have known of the true shape of mountains? Could anyone imagine that the solid massive mountain which he sees before him actually extends deep into the earth and has a root, as scientists assert? A large number of books of geology, when discussing mountains, only describe that part which is above the surface of the earth. This is because these books were not written by specialists in geology. However, modern geology has confirmed the truth of the Quranic verses.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science Vs Faith - by Edwardo Piet - September 28, 2008 at 12:09 pm
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Bungy - October 21, 2008 at 6:02 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Daystar - November 8, 2008 at 6:52 pm
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Kyuuketsuki - November 9, 2008 at 10:56 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Daystar - November 9, 2008 at 2:40 pm
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Kyuuketsuki - November 9, 2008 at 3:20 pm
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 7:34 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Edwardo Piet - November 9, 2008 at 11:07 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by leo-rcc - November 20, 2008 at 2:39 pm
RE: Science Vs Faith - by chatpilot - November 21, 2008 at 1:23 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by moslem - November 24, 2008 at 6:19 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Darwinian - November 24, 2008 at 9:55 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Kyuuketsuki - November 26, 2008 at 6:27 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Ihatejesus - November 27, 2008 at 3:46 pm
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Kyuuketsuki - December 1, 2008 at 6:27 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Edwardo Piet - December 2, 2008 at 8:35 pm
RE: Science Vs Faith - by moslem - December 17, 2008 at 3:28 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by leo-rcc - December 17, 2008 at 4:39 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by moslem - December 21, 2008 at 9:11 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by lukec - December 17, 2008 at 4:55 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by Purple Rabbit - December 21, 2008 at 9:25 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by leo-rcc - December 21, 2008 at 10:00 am
RE: Science Vs Faith - by chatpilot - December 22, 2008 at 9:58 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Science presuppositions as being grounded on faith Dolorian 12 2622 October 14, 2014 at 6:36 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science FifthElement 23 7947 June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Rahul
  Does confidence=faith in Science? (Guardian) Anymouse 12 3918 June 12, 2011 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: tackattack
  Science Laughs: Science Comedian Brian Malow orogenicman 4 4342 December 10, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Lethe
  Is 'faith' really a 'great cop-out'? CoxRox 126 51507 November 14, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)