RE: Benghazi: What's the Charge Again?
May 2, 2014 at 7:14 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 7:15 pm by Mudhammam.)
(May 2, 2014 at 4:50 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:(May 2, 2014 at 4:29 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: It also stinks to high heaven that CIA director David Petraeous was forced to resign days after the election over an affair, and a month prior his mistress accidentally admitted this:
OK, so the scandal is that we could have helped the ambassador but chose not to? Was this because sending Delta Force in, as this woman suggests we could have in time, would have exposed the blacksite and so a conscious decision was made to sacrifice the ambassador? Is this your allegation?
Details, please. If your going to allege a conspiracy, I want to at least get a clear accusation regarding means, motive and opportunity.
I don't think the GOP wants to disclose anything related to the alleged activity of the CIA annex. That's why they've been pursuing the stupid allegation that the Obama administration purposely let the ambassador die. It's basically all politics between the GOP and Obama, all smoke and mirrors to sidestep the real possibility that the CIA was engaged in illegal activity, i.e. taking people as prisoners. The outrage is that the administration misled the public. Why mislead the public unless they have something to cover-up? In way of evidence, what I'm aware of is the false narrative of the YouTube video put forth by the State Department and the resignation of the CIA director right after the election in light of his mistress spilling the beans on alleged activity of the CIA black site, a fact that as far as I know has been denied by the government (of course).