(May 10, 2014 at 1:07 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 10, 2014 at 1:02 am)eyemixer Wrote: Failure to pay a living wage can lead to massive increases in employee churn, leaving the employer with a chronically under-trained workforce that possesses low morale.
You are arguing that it is just good business sense to pay a living wage....which is highly situational. This has nothing to do with the morality.
Fair point.
(May 10, 2014 at 1:07 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 10, 2014 at 1:02 am)eyemixer Wrote: If (a) full time job(s) is incapable of providing basic necessities (not a living wage) then people are forced into government assistance programs, generally not viewed as a desirable outcome.
You don't want the state to be responsible for providing the means of living so therefore it falls on the employer? Why can't the state be responsible?....why does it have to be the employer?
To clarify, do you feel anyone is responsible for providing a means of living?
NOT logic:
1. Claim to have logic
2. Throw a tantrum when asked to present it
3. Claim you've already presented it
4. Repeat step 1
*Rampant.A.I.'s quote
1. Claim to have logic
2. Throw a tantrum when asked to present it
3. Claim you've already presented it
4. Repeat step 1
*Rampant.A.I.'s quote
