RE: What is "supernatural"?
May 12, 2014 at 10:59 am
(This post was last modified: May 12, 2014 at 11:02 am by Anomalocaris.)
(May 11, 2014 at 11:55 pm)Lek Wrote: That's not good enough for you because you rely on science to prove or disprove what it's not equipped for.
It's not good enough because it is not good enough. It is not good enough because it contains no consistent and demonstrably effective safeguards against wishthinking, hallucinaiton, and flat out lying and cheating. It would not be good enough even if no one had ever dreamed of science.
BTW, science does not rely on naturalistic explanation. Science relies on verifiable explanations that has underwent consistent and demonstrably effective safeguards against wishthinking, hallucinaiton, and flat out lying and cheating.
