A Serious Question For Theists

[Esquilax]

1. The old "primitive people were ignorant" red herring where you know very well that those people were not making scientific observations in the bible.

So are you saying that the bible wasn't intended to be treated as a real account? It wasn't set up as a position on the origins of the universe?

2. Spoken like a true empiricist. You insist on that point of fact, where biblical Christianity, for one, is based upon the premise of an unknowable fact.

An unknowable fact is indistinguishable from a nonexistent one.

Until you can get over that self imposed restriction, you're stuck with your illogical/ contradictory position.

You still haven't established any contradiction or illogical premise of my position. You've just asserted it.

Just to let you know esq, this is the end of my engaging with your sophistry in this thread.

That's just the way you work, isn't it? Evade, evade, evade, and then blame everyone else for not agreeing with you based on the barest of arguments that you've actually made.