RE: SCOTUS Rules In Favor Of Hobby Lobby
July 3, 2014 at 6:59 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2014 at 7:13 pm by Heywood.)
Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ ' Wrote: I would be okay with the idea as long as the bonus would be enough to cover the cost of contraceptives without insurance. I have not seen a single liberal here dispute this as a bad idea. It's just that it won't ever happen because it would be just as big a violation of Hobby Lobby's alleged religious faith to provide this extra item specifically as an allowance for those who choose to use it to purchase birth control. It gives the employee more freedom, but it doesn't matter because the company would never agree to it. And you know this, because you have no problem, personally, with what happened, but you want to pretend you're more enlightened than your more honest fellow extremists.
You can't speak for Hobby Lobby so you don't know what they would do. I suspect they would just view it as additional monetary compensation to the employee.
(July 3, 2014 at 12:54 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I don't have a 401k. I'm self employed, a business owner. I scrutinize my investment options carefully - and I can't even afford a decent advisor to catch shit I might miss. So let's hear you explain how Hobby Lobby is an absentee investor some more. That they don't do their due diligence while spreading around -other peoples money-. That they just don't know what's in the box. Please, tell us all again how it bothered them enough to find it in their employees benefit package...but not enough to scrutinize the 401k.
I wouldn't be surprised if Hobby Lobby contracts with someone to manage their 401k plan. Hobby Lobby is in the business of selling toys not investments.
They didn't have to search their employee benefit packages. This particular feature of the law was touted by the administration.
(July 3, 2014 at 5:39 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(July 3, 2014 at 3:36 pm)A Theist Wrote: hmmm...so I'm assuming, by your eminent fairness, that you're applying those same standards to someone like, for example, Minimalist, when he resorts to using epithets like "republicunts" and "nazis" against those he disagrees with.
And if you're not, surely you shouldn't be calling out a person for using epithets on one hand and then give a wink and a nod to someone else who's using them in the other. That would be "Double Standards".
Minimalist is a well-known ass. Who knew it was a club people would want to join?
You are right Mister Agenda, I'm sorry for being an ass by calling liberals....liberaltards.