Disproving the Bible

[Fidel_Castronaut]

There is no evidence that that is the only possible interpretation of that passage.

no evidence of the contrary either. Indeed, when something is down entirely to 'interpretation', then it is illogical to dismiss other interpretations to that end.

Many believe that they represent ages and interpreting it so does not change the meaning of Genesis or Christianity as a whole. In fact, many believe that God some version of evolution to get to what we have today.

Beliefs are irrelevant if we desire facts or evidence.

If you are going to add in the the issue of miracles, why is that a proof that the Bible has been disproved by science?

Science is not concerned with disproving the bible. It is merely concerned with the observable and testable reality which we inhabit. If the conclusions of those observations disprove a supposed 'miracle', then so be it.

A miracle is an event that cannot occur naturally. But that does not leave out the possibility of an outside force causing such an event to happen. No laws of nature are broken since natural laws assume only natural causation. You would have to disprove #2 (or show it is less probably than its opposite) below to use the miracle argument to disprove the Bible.

1. If God exists, miracles exist
2. God Exists
3. Therefore miracles exist.

Laconic reply of if.

Also, welcome.