RE: Disproving the Bible
July 8, 2014 at 4:44 pm
(This post was last modified: July 8, 2014 at 4:44 pm by LostLocke.)
(July 8, 2014 at 12:45 pm)SteveII Wrote: Let's discuss one--Contingency Argument....
1. Anything that exists has an explanation of its existence (either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external cause).
2. If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God.
3. The universe exists.
4. Therefore the explanation of the existence of the universe is God.
2. If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is the Valar.
3. The universe exists.
4. Therefore the explanation of the existence of the universe is the Valar.
See, simply stating something doesn't make it so. There needs to be something (evidence, data, tests, etc) to back it up.
If you can assert what you said and then insist we accept it as truth without any evidence, I can do the same for my 'hypothesis'.