(July 15, 2014 at 2:17 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote:(July 15, 2014 at 2:13 pm)SteveII Wrote: I didn't say the fourth option was God. I said the fourth option was that they didn't have a common ancestor. This is still a scientific explanation. Not to include it means you have made a philosophical decision that naturalism is true (which science is not capable of making on its own).
And if they "don't have a common ancestor", that means......
My point is that it does not matter to the science if they don't. Questions like "and if they don't" are metaphysical and should not be part of the equation.