RE: Something at work that irks me
July 16, 2014 at 1:31 pm
(This post was last modified: July 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm by Losty.)
(July 16, 2014 at 12:53 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:(July 16, 2014 at 6:36 am)Losty Wrote: It makes sense enough.
Some people are softer and more nurturing. Some people are stronger and more protective.
It's not always women being "the fairer sex", but it's all good.
I beg to disagree, I think every woman can be beautiful. Even if its not in the conventional way. Think of it like flowers, some are sweet and others are deadly and they are all different shapes, sizes and colors. But everyone of them is beautiful even if you don't know that till you see them.
What? At what point in my post did I say that some women are not beautiful?
Usually, when someone says the fairer sex, they mean softer and more gentle (read weaker and in need of protection). Women cannot be generalized into such a category because 1) most of the time we only appear to be softer and more gentle, and 2) many women are actually the strong protective type as many men are timid and gentle and looking for a strong woman to protect them. (Don't look here
picture me as a 1950's housewife with a kinky side) Anyways, I wasn't talking about beauty at all.
