(July 17, 2014 at 12:59 pm)SteveII Wrote: Junk DNA? Read http://www.sciencemag.org/content/337/6099/1159.summary
The ENCODE project was roundly criticized for its definitions of what is junk. Make sure you read not only the article that supports your position, but the ones that poke holes in it. And I think it was already mentioned that 20% are still junk.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/repo...efinitions
http://www.pnas.org/content/110/14/5294.full
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. "