The original post reads like esoteric gibberish to me. If you have a limited grasp of mathematics - which many do - you can't even begin to understand the premise of this argument let alone begin to construct a counterargument. Therefore, claiming it is bulletproof is intellectually dishonest. It'd be more accurate to say it's extremely difficult to understand.
By the way: I can provide an irrefutable argument that Elvis Presley is my regular hairdresser. However, I am only able to write it out in Scottish Gaelic...
By the way: I can provide an irrefutable argument that Elvis Presley is my regular hairdresser. However, I am only able to write it out in Scottish Gaelic...
Quote:Lastly, tea — unless one is drinking it in the Russian style — should be drunk without sugar. I know very well that I am in a minority here. But still, how can you call yourself a true tealover if you destroy the flavour of your tea by putting sugar in it? It would be equally reasonable to put in pepper or salt. Tea is meant to be bitter, just as beer is meant to be bitter. If you sweeten it, you are no longer tasting the tea, you are merely tasting the sugar; you could make a very similar drink by dissolving sugar in plain hot water. - George Orwell
