Ferguson: too much or not enough?

[Brakeman]

Nationwide, officer involved deaths are routinely investigated by their coworkers resulting in an impossible record of perfection. In Wisconsin alone, an "unjustified" ruling by an officer's department or commission cannot be found in 125 years.

Or -

http://data.newsday.com/crime/nassau-police/

.. In each case, department investigators reviewed the use of deadly force and reached the same conclusion within a day: The officer’s actions were justified.
..
Yet each time, Nassau police’s deadly force investigators validated the officer’s actions.

I suppose someone who uncritically believes the bullshit you believe will accept just about anything that an authority figure tells you. You should work on being less of a credulous fool.

I think this is absolutely true and should be strongly remembered in judging the claims from the police. However, it is the black witnesses' testimonies that have been impeached so far with the physical evidence, not the cop's.
When are you going to admit this? When are you going to admit that the two main black witnesses' testimonies that was initially relayed to all the sensation loving media and started the greater riot reaction were lying. They were lying and you and so many others believed them. The guy was not shot in the back.
When are you going to admit that:
1. He was not a honest guy crossing the street.
2. He had committed a very recent crime and would have freaked at the presence of a policeman.
3. He Was in a belligerent, aggressive mood.
4. He was shot about 6 times from the front, corroborating at least in part, with the cop's released testimony.
5. The black witness's testimonies that have been so widespread, have been racist lies, pure racist lies.