(June 11, 2010 at 5:11 pm)Ramsin.Kh Wrote:
I really like that. Its an elegant argument, and easy for a non-specialist like myself to follow. Good stuff.
There is a possible counter-argument that I can think of. I'm not sure if its sound or not, but here it is anyway:
What you're assuming here is that certain categories are applicable to all possible universes. For example, you assume that any universe can be described as a set of elements, and that there is a fact of the matter as to whether or not these elements exist. Put another way, you're pre-supposing at least 2 axioms:
1. That any universe consists of a set of elements {1...n}.
2. That every element either exists or doesn't exist. Either E(x) or not E(x).
These are unwarranted assumptions. If a universe really is illogical, then theres not reason to suppose that such axioms apply.
He who desires to worship God must harbor no childish illusions about the matter but bravely renounce his liberty and humanity.
Mikhail Bakunin
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything
Friedrich Nietzsche
Mikhail Bakunin
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything
Friedrich Nietzsche