RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 5:03 pm
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2014 at 5:04 pm by Surgenator.)
(October 2, 2014 at 4:18 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Complex Question? LOL
it can't get any simpler, any elementary kid can figure this one out.
"If you find new data that is more accurate, do you continue using the old data?"
the answer is no..
What fool would keep using inaccurate data if he has more accurate data available? Atheists apparently.
Tonus won't answer because he would destroy his own argument.
critical thinkers......smh
Blockhead, there is no one correct answer because it depends in what environment the DNA is in. The most common environment gives you a pitch/width to be 34/24.7 which does NOT EQUAL to the golden ratio.
http://www.uic.edu/classes/phys/phys461/...0/ANJUM04/
Quote:The most common DNA structure in solution is the B-DNA. Under conditions of applied force or twists in the DNA, or under low hydration conditions, it can adopt several helical conformations, referred to as the A-DNA, Z-DNA, S-DNA...
A-DNA B-DNA Z-DNA
Helix Diameter 25.5A 23.7A 18.4A
Helix pitch 25A 34A 47A
If there was one correct answer, then your assertion that the old measurement is obsolete would be correct. However, it is not that simple. I don't know what environment the DNA was in in the 1953 study (that got a ratio of 34/20). So I didn't claim their measurement to be obsolete. If the 1953 study had the DNA under the same conditions, then yes their measurement would become obsolete.
Also, do you actually think that howstuffworks.com is a scientific source? Do you think it has more credibility than a Nature papers or a university class course?
