RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 3, 2014 at 1:45 pm
(October 3, 2014 at 11:54 am)Huggy74 Wrote: A quotient is the result of dividing 2 numbers, 34/23.7 is not a ratio, if you had been paying attention you'd know that the 34 refers to the length of the DNA and the 23.7 the width, the ratio would be 1.434.Good, we agree that 34/23.7 is not the golden ratio.
Quote:Who said anything about ALL DATA, we were talking specifically MEASUREMENTS, Surgenator clearly asserted that there was newer data available and that the measurements from 1953 were not accurate, fine.No, I showed the original as the possible source of 34/21 ratio crap. Even though that paper measured 34/20 not 34/21. Thankfully, howstuffworks.com does quote their sources. And here it is.
Upon further questioning about the methods for Measuring DNA he posts an article from 1953! Thereby contradicting himself.
http://milan.milanovic.org/math/english/...lden2.html
The author is mathematician not a biologist. He didn't do the measurement nor does he site where he got that value. My source was from a Molecular Biophysics of the Cell course from the University of Illinois.
Quote:You can have it one of two ways, either my measurements from 1953 were in fact correct, or he contradicted himself.The 1953 measurement had a larger error. The newer measurements have smaller errors. The 1953 measurement is correct within its error. The newer measurements are correct within their error. Since the newer has a smaller error, they are more accurate. So if you want to be most accurate, you take the data that has the smallest error. Is this so fucking hard to understand?
