Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[Huggy Bear]

There are some truly exciting and great things about the Fibonacci sequence, but the nautilus shell isn't one of them. Nor is the sunflower except under the most optimal growing conditions though it's certainly the plan. Nor are all flower petals. Nor are our aesthetics really based on the golden rectangle.

http://nautil.us/issue/0/the-story-of-na...th-as-myth

http://www.intmath.com/blog/is-phi-a-fib...d=noscript

http://dropbox.bachnetwork.co.uk/ub1/tatlow.pdf

http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4325

https://philosophynow.org/issues/54/Bad_...Fibophiles

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread844170/pg1

The point is not that the sequence doesn't exist in nature, just that it's not nearly so prevalent or central as gee-whiz science programs suggest. And in the real world it tends to be rather imperfect at best. The very fact that the most common example given is the nautilus which doesn't actual fit, should give you pause.

The point is I've been accursed of cherry picking, even though none of my sources have any vested interest in pushing the fibonacci sequence, if my source was a creationist website for an example, there would be a clear bias, so i'm looking for sources with no clear agenda.

Your latest links

Math as Myth
http://nautil.us/issue/0/the-story-of-na...th-as-myth
Is Phi a Fibonacci furphy?
http://www.intmath.com/blog/is-phi-a-fib...d=noscript
Skeptoid
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4325

My source was an actual mathematician..