@DeistPaladin, was the book of Acts included along with Luke in the canon of Marcion? I know that many people think Luke and Acts were a single book. Apparently the apologists were very thorough in their criticism of Marcion's Gospel of the Lord, so we should know if it included both Luke and Acts. If Acts was not part of Marcion's canon, isn't that suspicious?
What if, instead of Marcion editing Luke to create his Gospel of the Lord, somebody edited Marcion's gospel to create Luke and then invented Acts to go with it? And Paul's epistles might have received the same treatment?
What if, instead of Marcion editing Luke to create his Gospel of the Lord, somebody edited Marcion's gospel to create Luke and then invented Acts to go with it? And Paul's epistles might have received the same treatment?