RE: Truth in context vs ultimate truth
March 15, 2015 at 11:13 am
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2015 at 11:15 am by bennyboy.)
(March 15, 2015 at 11:03 am)rasetsu Wrote: Mostly empty space? No, the space is filled with forces, and it's the interplay of invisible forces which make up the solidity. Just because it isn't a particle doesn't mean it isn't a part of the real.Where are forces, and what are they, beyond descriptions of the relationships among things? This empty space filled with particle-less forces is starting to sound a lot like eastern philosophy (one hand clapping), or like some of the Christian theosophical ideas. Does slapping a few formulae on them and dubbing them "science" rather than philosophical or divine principles really change what they are, and their inaccessability to direct knowledge?
