(March 19, 2015 at 8:25 am)Brian37 Wrote: No, si fi is just that, that is why it is called FICTION. Science in reality allows for imagining the possibilities but it does not gap fill with mere fiction.
It doesn't? Einstein filled his inability to accept observations of the universe's expansion with a fictional constant. The constant is still being tossed around to this day.
(March 19, 2015 at 8:25 am)Brian37 Wrote: If you are stupidly going to think that everything works by default just because you uttered it, then find a god or a church and go back. Science works off METHOD not making shit up.
Sad hypocrite then. I knew it.
Here you are, arguing about how things are, completely convinced you're right because it's you who made the argument, when you're demonstrably wrong about a lot of things, and other things (like the one below) are just strawmen.
(March 19, 2015 at 8:25 am)Brian37 Wrote: There is a HUGE difference between when science "imagines" and how laypersons "imagine" and the difference is testing and falsification and peer review. Si fi does not count as science that is why it is called FICTION.
Sci-fi is a mixture of science and fiction. It takes a concept or idea or fact from science and pushes it to the brink.
Are X-Men possible? No. Are mutations possible? Yes.
Is space travel possible? Yes. Is controlling a black hole in order to do it possible? Probably not.
Are aliens possible? Yes. Do they look like little grey men? Probably not.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
![[Image: LB_Header_Idea_A.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fkk172%2FBlaziken_rjcf%2FLB_Header_Idea_A.jpg)