The argument against God

[DD_8630]

'Nothing, since there is no such "atheistical [sic] perception".'

I would say skepticism is still a perception. What we percive effects the reality we live in. Reality is perception hence unless you are seperate from reality, you will have a perception.

Guh... no. Scepticism is a stance, one where you don't blindly believe every claim that comes your way, where you say "Well, prove it".

And it should go without saying that reality isn't a perspective either, and nor does our perception affect the reality.

What is, is. What isn't, isn't. What we see is irrelevant to that.

I don't think atheism is much of a philosophy if it can not promote itself without giving the negitive of another philosophy. Why are you atheist?

Because there's no reason to be anything but an atheist. If there is no evidence for or against the existence of something, logic dictates that we make no claims as to its existence of non-existence.

The real question is, why believe something exists if there is no evidence for it?

---

I stand corrected.

But then again if he knows deities exist, he probably believes that too.

Knowledge is a subset of belief, true dat :p