RE: Being gay is a fetish.
April 23, 2015 at 3:39 pm
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2015 at 3:40 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
I agree with you Hats in that there must be a compelling state interest when restricting personal liberties. With respect to religious organizations using tax money to provide services an important distinction is whether they can use such funds to provide a specific public good without being forced to provide another service over and above the service they are prepared to provide. If you run a soup kitchen is it absolutely necessary to also provide dietary education? Or if you provide two distinct services one secular and the other religious, why is wrong to provide funding to the secular service so long as provision of the secular service is not contingent upon the religious one?
