(April 24, 2015 at 6:48 pm)gomlbrobro Wrote: It "indicates" that it would be related to a deity. If that were true, it would also mean that science is not the creation of our universe. It is "in my opinion" given that all of the theories of deities in our culture, that this would be a reasonable assumption.
How would it indicate that? Again, supernatural does not necessarily mean divine; cut out the assumptions and what you'd like to be true, and look at what you're actually saying. There's a connection you've made that doesn't exist.
Quote:"In my opinion" and "my findings" imply that when I say "evidence", it means that I deem it as evidence for myself. Do I have "evidence" by your terms, no... But I deem it as true based on the countless testimonies (of athiests as well), cults, and historical accounts to name a few. If you have not done sufficient research on this topic, you are the one that is fooled, not me.
Personal testimony is spurious evidence at best, for a number of reasons. But if you're willing to fall back on the same old "I have my evidence, but it's not real enough to convince you," routine that every other theist uses, including ones who believe in a different god to yours... well, then you are the one that is fooled, not me.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
