(January 23, 2009 at 1:30 pm)CoxRox Wrote: I don't think it's true to say that theists or deists have no proof for their assumptions or belief in a 'god'. The proofs or evidence we present are not accepted by atheists. This doesn't mean they are not evidence of an intelligence outside of what we know.
So, imagine if I were to write on a scrap of paper "Invisible pink unicorns exist", and present this as evidence for the existence of said unicorns.
Now, as conclusive as my proof is.... people don't accept it.
Are you suggesting that this doesn't mean it is not evidence for my unicorns?
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip