(June 17, 2015 at 10:09 pm)whateverist Wrote:(June 17, 2015 at 8:57 pm)Cephus Wrote: I would never debate Craig for the same reason I'd never debate Ken Ham. He's already said that there is absolutely nothing that anyone could ever say, no amount of evidence that anyone could provide, that could ever convince him that he was wrong. That makes the whole idea of a debate pointless.
That is the exact same reason I would never climb up on a stage in front of hundreds, facing my fear of public speaking in order to try to dumb down a point so far that even an imbecile can understand.
Oh yeah, now die zombie thread something, something ..
Isn't Dawkins equally disingenuous? Is he truly going to listen to WLC and reason on what he is saying? Or even when atheist say that if they knew god existed they still wouldn't worship them. Its a point of principle nothing else. Hypothetical questions are only good for that
