What are we? The federal government? We're not required to post in red or green, or to PM you. We mainly do that to give people who might not otherwise know we are mods an easy way of figuring it out. You had seven or eight pages consisting mostly of staff admonishing to change your signature. Please, with the "official" bullshit.
Anyway, you said:
No, you did not have your signature privileges revoked for quoting someone. That is what you are lying about. The thread you linked contains pages worth of staff explaining to you exactly why your sig privileges were revoked, and quoting someone was certainly not why. You know this- but you're so intellectually and blatantly dishonest, you're probably not going to admit it.
It'd be nice to get this thread off the Huggy train.
Anyway, you said:
Quote:I should add, I've had my sig privileges revoked for quoting someone in my sig, while ironically you quote someone in yours... I could point out others doing the same, but who cares about fairness right?
No, you did not have your signature privileges revoked for quoting someone. That is what you are lying about. The thread you linked contains pages worth of staff explaining to you exactly why your sig privileges were revoked, and quoting someone was certainly not why. You know this- but you're so intellectually and blatantly dishonest, you're probably not going to admit it.
It'd be nice to get this thread off the Huggy train.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
