RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
July 3, 2015 at 6:17 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2015 at 6:18 pm by Longhorn.)
(July 3, 2015 at 6:05 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Incorrectomundo, gentlemen.
In the "Minimal Fact Approach" thread, I am arguing for the resurrection of Jesus on the basis of four facts which the overwhelming majority of ALL NT scholars (believers and skeptics alike) accept as highly probable. The fifth fact is accepted by a simple majority.
That's kinda the whole point. These are not facts with which you may take issue easily as they are most generally conceded as undisputed.
See ya there.
They. Are. Not. Facts.
You're using one part of the bible to support another part of the bible. Bullshit. You can't back up your claim WITH YOUR CLAIM. it's nonsense. It's been explained to you multiple times in that thread, but you continue to disregard that and go on not proving anything.
For the last time. You're doing the opposite of what you think. Your complete and very evident inability to produce a single piece of evidence undermines the validity of your god. Omnipotent, omnipresent, cares what I think about it, but cannot be demonstrated in any way?
Who are you kidding?
