(July 14, 2015 at 9:42 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:(July 14, 2015 at 9:22 am)Drich Wrote: no. Because again She has control over what I NEED. There are two parts to that verse, and both have to be applied together.
Now if She has my intrest in the forefront of her mind as she is in mine then we will accomidate eachother's needs, but if for some reason we can't or shouldn't then just keep reading pinky, and you'll find there is even a provision for that.
Yeah yeah...all that "don't deprive each other, except for a time, and then come back together" bullshit. You're talking to an advanced biblical apologist. That "just keep reading" shit doesn't work on me. I know what the bible says, and I know the context. Know your place.
You described a hypothetical situation earlier where a wife was in lots of pain for a long time and so does not wish to have sex (with good reason), and according to you it's acceptable in that situation for the husband to manipulate her into having sex by saying he really needs it and promising to be quick. You then go on later to talk about how if a wife really has her husband's needs in a place of priority, she'll be willing to consent and suffer through sex, and it's a sin if she doesn't pretend to enjoy it. Regardless of what the bible actually says about consent, your views on it are made plain by what YOU say about it. What makes it scary is that you think the bible supports you.
yeah, yeah... I know what I said and your paraphrase sounds like nothing I have EVER said. You are using an old standby atheist tactic/logic call a strawman. Maybe that is why you did not quote the actual post all of what you claim came from.
