(December 15, 2011 at 6:16 pm)helmespc Wrote: So we're pretty much at the conclusion that there is no evidence here... the same conclusion I have reached many times in the past. So why is it considered undisputed fact that he DID exist? My partner is a master's student in history... she and her (highly intelligent) colleagues have repeatedly rejected the notion that Jesus is not real, with no real argument as to why we shouldn't question the existence of a historical Jesus? I've pretty much taken for granted that none of the events in the bible are historical in the least, and I don't understand why anyone else would come to the same conclusion.
It's called brain washing. And no there is no evidence to support an Historical JESUS as purported in the BIBLE......he was a GHOST of ANTIQUITY.
