Hello

[dagda]

So, when science disagrees with you, it is bad science?

No, when people claim something is science and yet provide no empirical evidence or experiments, it is bad science.

But he was subjected to experiments by a man who had a lot to lose in finding Indridason the real deal. He could not prove he was a fruad, and came away from the experience convinced that Indridason was not faking his mediumship-although thought that there was some scientific explanation for the event, but could think of none.

Anyway, the refrences:

http://www.answers.com/topic/indridi-indridason (breif account)

http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/seance/78/ii.htm (indepth summary)

http://www3.hi.is/~erlendur/english/Indr...4_1989.pdf (96 page study)

The Usborne Book of the Haunted World (amounts to 2 paragraphs on Indridason)


Intrestingly about the fire account, Indridason reported it on the 24 of November at 9:45 and said it was in a lamp factory. On the 24 of November at 12 midnight (around 9:45 Icelandic time) a fire broke out in a lamp facttory in the Danish capital.

My promised case studies are taking longer than first thought. I may not be able to present them till the weekend.