(April 18, 2013 at 7:12 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: That’s not how accelerated nuclear decay works at all; each rate is accelerated proportionally, so it does not change their relation to one another at all.
So you assert. However Dr. Wiens and practically every other physicist and geologists thinks otherwise. Got any actual evidence to back up your bullshit?
Quote:Can you point to any examples where a rock of empirically known age has been accurately dated using radiometric dating?
As a matter of fact I can.
Historical Volcanic Lavas Dated at Zero from K40/Ar40
Location Year of Eruption
Mt. Milhara, Japan 1951
Sakurajima, Japan 1946
Kilauea, Hawaii 1750
Kilauea, Hawaii 1955
Mauna Loa, Hawaii 1907
Mt. Etna, Sicily 252
Mt. Etna, Sicily 1329
Mt. Etna, Sicily 1444
Mt. Etna, Sicily 1536
Mt. Etna, Sicily 1669
Mt. Etna, Sicily 1886
Mt. Vesuvius, Italy 1944
Askja, Iceland ~1500 BCE
Lakagigar, Iceland 1783
Ngauruhoe, New Zealand 1954
Paracutin, Mexico 1944
Augustine, Alaska 1935
Cinder Cone, California 1851
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.