(November 11, 2008 at 5:06 pm)CoxRox Wrote: Leo, I try to check and review many sources and not take arguments at face value. I'm reading up on Miller etc as well as Behe etc. Have I used an argument that was only supported with one source??
Sorry, I guess I wasn't making myself very clear there. I trust you will attempt everything to see the evidence as objective as you can, which is what we all should do.
I have not read the book from Behe, but I have been in a lot of discussions with people defending the book and citing Behe's hypothesis and read several articles from him and the Discovery institute. These people are fully in their right to believe what they want to believe, but they are going about it all the wrong way trying to get this squeezed into science education. And I really am cross with Behe about that because as a scientist he should know how to get his hypothesis validated and taught the right way he doesn't do it. I suspect it is because deep down he knows it wouldn't hold up against the peer review he would get should he want to publish his findings.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
